From narten@hygro.adsl.duke.edu Mon Dec 20 14:36:45 1999 Return-Path: Delivered-To: djb@cr.yp.to Received: (qmail 27301 invoked from network); 20 Dec 1999 14:36:44 -0000 Received: from hygro.adsl.duke.edu (152.16.64.159) by koobera.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 20 Dec 1999 14:36:44 -0000 Received: from hygro.adsl.duke.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hygro.adsl.duke.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA08841; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 09:35:23 -0500 Message-Id: <199912201435.JAA08841@hygro.adsl.duke.edu> To: "D. J. Bernstein" cc: iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: namedroppers censorship In-Reply-To: Message from "D. J. Bernstein" of "19 Dec 1999 05:34:49 GMT." <19991219053449.17053.qmail@cr.yp.to> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 09:35:23 -0500 From: Thomas Narten Dan, > I requested a year ago that the IESG stop using censored mailing > lists for standardization activities. I once again request that the > IESG stop using censored mailing lists for standardization > activities. I request that, in particular, the IESG move DNS > standardization activities from the namedroppers mailing list to an > open mailing list. The IESG recognizes that the moderating of IETF mailing lists is a sometimes necessary and approriate tool to help manage WG activities. As with other WG activities, if you disagree with a particular aspect of how a WG is being managed, you should first take your specific complaint to the chairs (dnsind has two of them). If this does not result in a satisfactory resolution of the issue, you can appeal to the appropriate Area Director(s), etc. Thomas